Player v. Chandler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that for there to be a valid and enforceable contract, there must be a meeting of the minds between the parties with regard to all essential and material terms of the agreement
• suggesting that, in an action brought by lessees against lessors regarding oral modifications of a written lease contract, S.C.Code Ann. Secs. 32-3-10(4), 32-3-10(5), and 27-35-20 might all have applicability
• suggesting that, in an action brought by lessees against lessors regarding oral modifications of a written lease contract, S.C.Code Ann. §§ 32-3-10(4), 32-3-10(5), and 27-35-20 might all have applicability
• holding failure to put contract for the sale of land in writing renders it void, unless an exception applies
• stating the “meeting of minds” requirement is not based on secret purpose or intention on the part of one of the parties
• finding a description of the extent and boundary of the property to be an essential term of a contract pertaining to real estate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).