Skip to main content

Wimberly v. State

Citations

  • 41 So. 3d 298
  • 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 9569
  • 2010 WL 2675319

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding argument improper because “it injected ‘facts’ not contained in the evidence” and was “completely unsupported by any evidence at trial”
  • defendant’s reference to homicide victim with a racial epithet was relevant to premeditation
  • “Improper comments rise to the level of fundamental error only where the error reaches down into the validity of the trial itself to the extent that a verdict of guilty could not have been obtained without the assistance of the alleged error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Taylor, Warner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.