N.D. Iowa· 8/28/1992
Wiltgen v. United States
Citations
- 813 F. Supp. 1387
- 25 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 931
- 71 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 691
- 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19685
- 1992 WL 447182
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating \it often happens that those cases closer in time to the enactment of a statute or the handing down of a precedent are in a better position to assess its true character\
- relying on Irwin in applying equitable tolling to tax refund claim
- mental incompetence may toll statute of limitations in tax refund actions
- permitting equitable tolling of Section 651 l’s limitations for schizophrenia
- permitting equitable tolling of Section 6511’s limitations for schizophrenia
- tolling § 6511(b)(2)(A) requirement for mentally ill individual
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Donald E. O'Brien
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Charles J. Oropallo v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 1993-05-24· cited 60×
- Webb v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 1995-10-02· cited 51×
- Risman v. CommissionerU.S. Tax Court· 1993-03-16· cited 31×
- Marian Brockamp, Administrator and Sole Residuary Beneficiary of the Estate of Stanley B. McGill Deceased v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1995-10-05· cited 29×
- Owen A. Moran and Jean B. Moran v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 1995-08-24· cited 25×
- Viglas v. BrownVeterans Claims· 1994-07-22· cited 10×
- Nixon v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa· 2005-09-30· cited 9×
- Brockamp v. United StatesC.D. California· 1994-07-26· cited 7×
- Scott v. United StatesD. Hawaii· 1993-11-19· cited 6×
- Willis v. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue ServiceS.D. New York· 1994-03-31· cited 6×
- Webb v. United StatesE.D. Virginia· 1994-05-04· cited 5×
- First Interstate Bank of Nevada v. United StatesD. Nevada· 1994-11-21· cited 2×
- Pransky v. Internal Revenue Service (In Re Pransky)D. New Jersey· 1999-11-03· cited 2×
- Dougherty v. Internal Revenue Service, Special Procedures Division (In re Dougherty)E.D. Pennsylvania· 1995-10-25· cited 1×
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1989-05-01· cited 22,300×
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court· 1974-04-17· cited 13,385×
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court· 1991-01-22· cited 3,247×
- Holmberg v. ArmbrechtSupreme Court· 1946-02-25· cited 1,492×
- United States v. DalmSupreme Court· 1990-03-21· cited 899×
- Rosenman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1945-01-29· cited 255×
- Charlotte Fusco and Daniel Boe v. Xerox CorporationEighth Circuit· 1982-05-25· cited 154×
- Perkins v. SpiveyEighth Circuit· 1990-07-24· cited 94×
- Arthur C. Ewing A/K/A A. Clifford Ewing Maxine H. Ewing v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 1990-12-10· cited 65×
- United States v. Dubuque Packing Company, a Corporation, Dubuque Packing Company, a Corporation v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1956-04-27· cited 58×
- Thomas v. Mercantile Nat. Bank at DallasFifth Circuit· 1953-06-18· cited 55×
- Tedroe J. Ford, Jr. And Margaret Ford v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1980-06-05· cited 50×
- Budd Company v. United StatesThird Circuit· 1957-11-27· cited 43×
- Charles Leich and Company v. The United StatesCourt of Claims· 1964-03-13· cited 39×
- Francis H. Ameel, Administrator D.B.N. Estate of Mary E. Ameel v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 1970-06-03· cited 37×
- Rose v. United StatesThird Circuit· 1958-06-16· cited 30×
- Herbert A. Hill and Alfred E. Hill, Executors of the Estate of Alfred W. Hill, Deceased v. United StatesThird Circuit· 1959-02-25· cited 27×
- William Woods Plankinton v. United StatesSeventh Circuit· 1959-06-01· cited 21×
- Northern Natural Gas Company v. The United StatesCourt of Claims· 1965-12-17· cited 21×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.