Skip to main content

Wilson v. Wilson

Citations

  • 732 N.E.2d 841
  • 2000 Ind. App. LEXIS 1144
  • 2000 WL 1031123

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the presumption that the trial court made all the proper considerations in crafting its property distribution is one of the strongest presumptions applicable to our consideration on appeal
  • husband failed to rebut presumption that an equal division of marital property is just and reasonable, where he failed to present evidence of his premarital-employment contribution
  • “We agree with Husband that the marital pot closes on the date the petition for dissolution is filed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robb, Sharpnack, Bailey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.