Wilson v. State
Citations
- 70 Miss. 595
Syllabus
<p>Indictment. Attorney before grand jury. Improper influence.</p> <p>Where an attorney, who, though not employed to prosecute, goes before the grand jury, and, as a private prosecutor — not a witness — uses his influence in furtherance of a presentment, which is made, the indictment will be held invalid. Durr v. State, 53 JVIiss., 425; Welch v. State, 68 lb., 341.</p>
Judges: Cooper
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. AtkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1979-07-17· cited 145×
- United States v. RosenthalU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York· 1903-03-17· cited 57×
- Corbin v. BroadmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1967-11-10· cited 30×
- United States v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Tennessee· 1908-07-03· cited 25×
- Nichols v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1916-02-04· cited 21×
- Hood v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1988-03-16· cited 19×
- Blau v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1903-03-15· cited 18×
- Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1900-01-15· cited 14×
- State v. BaconMississippi Supreme Court· 1899-12-15· cited 13×
- Collier v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1913-03-15· cited 12×
- State v. BarnettMississippi Supreme Court· 1910-10-15· cited 6×
- Herrington v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1910-10-15· cited 5×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.