Wilson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding there was no error in adjudication that defendant was guilty under both counts of information which charged the sale and possession of heroin, but only one sentence could be imposed and sentence should be for the highest offense charged
• holding there was no error in adjudication that defendant was guilty under both counts of information which charged the sale and possession of heroin, but only one sentence could be imposed and sentence should be for the highest offense charged
• holding there was no error in adjudication that defendant was guilty under both counts of information which charged the sale and possession of heroin, but only one sentence could be imposed and sentence should be for the highest offense charged

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Robinson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-01-26· cited 6×
• Rosa v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-07-16· cited 3×
• OMAR RUSHAWN BUGGS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-04-03
• Buggs v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-04-03

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Alben Wm. Barkley Truitt
  Fifth Circuit· 1971-04-20· cited 14×
• Bernard v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1973-03-20· cited 12×
• Mendez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1973-07-17· cited 2×