Wilson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the defendant’s asking an investigator to “help [him] out” and the interviewing detective’s responding, “All right. What I’ve got to do before I can talk to you is read you your rights, OK?” did not constitute an impermissible hope of benefit
• no hope of benefit inducing statement where record reflects no promises, explicit or implicit, related to leniency in charges or sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Redding v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2015-10-19· cited 29×
• Johnson v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2014-06-30· cited 24×
• Shepard v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2016-11-21· cited 20×
• Acosta v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2021-04-19· cited 6×
• Tolbert v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2020-02-28

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Brown v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2012-04-24· cited 47×
• Abdullah v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2008-10-06· cited 40×
• State v. Ray
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2000-06-05· cited 33×
• Moore v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2010-11-08· cited 30×
• Barnes v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2010-06-28· cited 29×
• Canty v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2010-03-01· cited 22×
• Harvey v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2013-04-15· cited 13×