Wilson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, in a criminal case, lack of complete trial transcript does not automatically warrant new trial, but holding that a new trial was justified given the impossibility of reconstructing a substitute record sufficient for consideration of the specified appellate issues
• where parties attempt to reconstruct record but fail, remedy is new trial
• where parties attempt to reconstruct record but, fail, remedy is new trial
• where parties attempt to reconstruct record but fail, remedy is new trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bradley v. Hazard Technology Co.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-10-12· cited 32×
• People v. Banks
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2007-12-19· cited 27×
• Richardson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-05-14· cited 20×
• State v. Ladson
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-04-09· cited 16×
• Thompson v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2008-09-03· cited 7×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• King v. State Roads Commission of the State Highway Administration
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-02-14· cited 41×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-08-26· cited 21×
• Kennedy v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-11-12· cited 9×