Skip to main content

Wilson v. State

Citations

  • 677 N.E.2d 586
  • 1997 Ind. App. LEXIS 93
  • 1997 WL 104561

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the witness’s recantation was credible as it exposed the witness to prosecution for perjury
  • recognizing that the witness's recantation was credible as it exposed the witness to prosecution for perjury
  • recognizing that \our supreme court decided long ago that evidence which destroys or obliterates the testimony upon which a conviction was obtained is not appropriately considered as merely impeaching evidence\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Najam, Riley, Robertson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.