Wilson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the placement of the “and/or” conjunction between the names of victims rather than co-defendants did not prejudice the defendant and was not fundamental error
• holding because the court placed the “and/or” conjunction between the names of the two victims rather than co-defendants it “in no way prejudiced [the defendant]” and did not result in fundamental error
• explaining the “and/or” conjunction in no way prejudiced the defendant when the conjunction is placed between the names of two officers who the defendant resisted during an arrest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dawson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-08-28· cited 2×
• Lee v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-06-02
• Peters v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-01-27

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Martinez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-05-10· cited 26×
• Cabrera v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-01-05· cited 22×
• Dorsett v. McRay
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-04-13· cited 16×
• Lloyd v. Crosby
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-12-28· cited 9×