Skip to main content

Wilson v. State

Citations

  • 614 S.W.2d 663
  • 272 Ark. 361
  • 1981 Ark. LEXIS 1288

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that the trial court did not err in denying a motion for new trial based on the testimony of the defendant and another man that they bad seen the bailiff answering questions from the jury, because the defendant failed to show that the bailiff had advised the jury on the law
  • rejecting the defendant’s claim for a new trial, for reasons including his failure to prove to the trial court that the bailiff had counseled the jury on a point of law or had acted to prejudice the defendant’s rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hickman, Purtle, Holt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.