Wilson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding an applicant who was denied his right to a direct appeal due to ineffective assistance of counsel should not be denied his right to a PCR application because of the one-year statute of limitations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Whitehead v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-12-16· cited 24×
• Pelzer v. State
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-06-05· cited 12×
• Leamon v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-03-28· cited 8×
• Dearybury v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-01-09· cited 6×
• State v. Devore
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-03-23· cited 6×
• Ferguson v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-05-26· cited 4×
• Graham v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-05-07· cited 3×
• Sutton v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-12-13· cited 2×
• Mack v. State of SC
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2021-04-28

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Anders v. California
  Supreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
• Davis v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-04-23· cited 231×
• Al-Shabazz v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-02-14· cited 168×
• White v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1974-08-28· cited 141×
• Odom v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-11-15· cited 24×
• In the Matter of an Anony. Mem. of the Bar
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-01-18· cited 8×
• Poston v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-02-22· cited 2×