Wilson v. Neal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that once Wilson was convicted in federal court, he was precluded from relitigating the elements of the crimes during the disbarment proceeding
• refusing to address appellant’s arguments on appeal because he did not raise them below or seek a ruling from the court in a disbarment action
• refusing to address appellant's arguments on appeal because he did not raise them below or seek a ruling from the court in a disbarment action
• declining to address issue for first time on appeal following disbarment proceedings
• noted as Wilson IV by my colleagues
• noted as Wilson IV by my colleagues

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).