Stein v. Lukas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “malice can be inferred either from a conscious indifference to the consequences of one’s actions or from a reckless disregard of those same consequences”
• affirming denial of fees because the action was “essentially a deceit action sounding in tort”
• “requiring damage to be capable of exact determination both in time and amount”
• \requiring damage to be capable of exact determination both in time and amount\
• “prejudgment interest is not recoverable where damages are inexact and uncertain”
• trial court erred in refusing to give instruction on punitive damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).