Wilson v. Jones

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• based on judge’s instructions to the jury on loss of future earning capacity, an award for future lost earnings was not intended to compensate for future wages actually lost

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gallo v. Yamaha Motor Corp., USA
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-03-26· cited 35×
• Schroeder v. Schrader
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1996-08-28· cited 15×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lewis v. Pruitt
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-01-04· cited 48×
• Williams v. Dulaney
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-07-06· cited 25×