Williams v. Dulaney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[w]ork loss within the meaning of the No-fault Act is economic detriment resulting from inability to work; in other words loss of a paycheck”
• \[w]ork loss within the meaning of the No-fault Act is economic detriment resulting from inability to work; in other words loss of a paycheck\
• the No-Fault Act provides for basic loss benefits for recovery of wages actually lost, but not for lost earning capacity
• judge must make initial determination whether facts presented to jury can, as a matter of law, meet threshold; if they can, factual question must be submitted to jury
• “It is the duty of the trial judge to determine, prior to sending the case to the jury, whether or not the plaintiff has introduced sufficient evidence to establish the elements necessary to maintain an action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).