Skip to main content

Wilson v. Image Flooring, LLC

Citations

  • 400 S.W.3d 386
  • 2013 WL 1110878
  • 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 345

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the general rule in McHaffie does not apply where there are claims for punitive damages
  • setting forth six considerations relevant to a court’s superseding-cause determination (quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts § 442)
  • applying Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws § 146 to determine which state’s law governs in a negligence action
  • “[W]e believe that the rule announced in McHaffie does not apply where punitive damages are claimed against the employer . . . .”
  • “…we believe that the rule announced in McHaffie does not apply where punitive damages are claimed against the employer…”
  • “Generally, the only factors that are relevant in a tort action are those identified in subsections (b) and (c) . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hardwick, Mitchell, Newton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.