Wilson v. Hayes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We interpret a contract as a whole, . . . [but] this approach does not permit us to read one provision of a contract as altering the plain meaning of another.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Yehuda Steiner v. American Friends of Lubavitch (Chaabad)
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2018-02-01· cited 9×
• Robert Goodrich v. Bank of America N.A.
  D.C. Circuit· 2025-05-06· cited 4×
• Mingle v. Oak Street Apartments LTD, C/O CIH
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2021-04-29
• Inova Health Care Services, for Inova Fairfax Hospital and Its Department, Life With Cancer v. Omni Shoreham Corporation
  District of Columbia· 2022-03-22

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Dodek v. Cf 16 Corp.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-02-11· cited 70×
• Auxier v. Kraisel
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-09-29· cited 57×
• District of Columbia v. Campbell
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-10-02· cited 56×
• Shreeve v. Greer
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1946-10-21· cited 52×
• Roberts-Douglas v. Meares
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-11-03· cited 35×
• Steele Foundations, Inc. v. Clark Construction Group, Inc.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-12-13· cited 33×
• Amidon v. Amidon
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1971-08-06· cited 28×
• Drazin v. American Oil Co.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-11-13· cited 25×
• Curtis v. Gordon
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-10-01· cited 16×
• Malik Corp. v. Tenacity Group, LLC
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2008-12-11· cited 9×
• Poole v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-05-31· cited 5×
• In re Moses
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-06-08· cited 2×