Wilson v. Daniel International Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the terminology used by the parties is not controlling of their relationship
• stating that the terminology used by the parties is not controlling of their relationship
• stating that the terminology used by the parties is not controlling of their relationship
• stating the terminology used by the parties is not controlling of their relationship
• Statutory employee doctrine does not apply to “the relationship of buyer and seller of a commodity or material.”
• “The impact of the statute is on employees engaged in work executed by subcontract. It is inapplicable to the relationship of buyer and seller of a commodity or material.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).