MacK v. R. C. Motor Lines, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “essential to business”, “integral part”, “usual and necessary”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• W. C. & A. N. Miller Development Co. v. Honaker
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1978-07-17· cited 12×
• Carlos A. Singleton and Shelby Singleton v. J.P. Stevens & Co., Inc. v. Huntington and Guerry Electric Company, Third-Party
  Third Circuit· 1984-03-26· cited 10×
• Singleton v. JP Stevens & Co., Inc.
  D. South Carolina· 1982-01-22· cited 8×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1958-06-23· cited 922×
• James M. Walker v. United States Gypsum Company, and Third-Party and Coley & Peterson, Incorporated, Third-Party
  Third Circuit· 1959-10-05· cited 39×
• Adams v. Davison-Paxon Co.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1957-02-13· cited 38×
• John G. MacMullen v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Company
  Fourth Circuit· 1963-01-07· cited 24×
• Wilson v. Daniel International Corp.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1973-06-21· cited 19×
• Bell v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Co.
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1959-07-07· cited 14×
• Grayce E. Corollo v. S. S. Kresge Company, D/B/A K-Mart
  Fourth Circuit· 1972-03-06· cited 10×