Kentucky Supreme Court· 2/22/2001

Wilson v. Commonwealth

Citations

37 S.W.3d 745
2001 Ky. LEXIS 27
2001 WL 173913

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“[E]vidence cannot be admitted against an accused if the evidence is derivative of the original illegality_”
“[A]n officer who has probable cause to believe a civil traffic violation has occurred may stop a vehicle regardless of his or her subjective motivation in doing so.”
“[A]n officer who has probable cause to believe a civil traffic violation has occurred may stop a vehicle regardless of his or her subjective motivation in doing so.”
“[A]n officer who has probable cause to believe a civil traffic violation has occurred may stop a vehicle regardless of his or her subjective motivation in doing so.”
\[A]n officer who has probable cause to believe a civil traffic violation has occurred may stop a vehicle regardless of his or her subjective motivation in doing so.\
“Although Detective Royse -9- appears to have stopped Wilson to further a drug investigation, his subjective motivation does not invalidate the stop as it was made validly and conducted within the bounds of official propriety.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lambert, Cooper, Graves, Keller, Wintersheimer, Stumbo, Johnstone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.