Sixth Circuit· 10/11/2001

Willie Brumley v. Curtis Wingard

Citations

269 F.3d 629
57 Fed. R. Serv. 599
2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 21697
2001 WL 1245217

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding not harmless admission of videotaped deposition in violation of Confrontation Clause because deposition was “the key piece of evidence” and deponent was the prosecution’s “principal witness” (internal quotation marks omitted)
noting that “defense counsel objected, preserving its arguments for appeal,” trial judge overruled those objections, and “jury then viewed the cleaned-up version of the videotaped deposition [of the out of state witness]”
finding Ohio Crim. R. 15(F) inconsistent with the Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause
finding Ohio Crim. R. 15(F) inconsistent with the Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause
finding a lack of good faith where the prosecution failed to utilize the Uniform Act to Secure the Attendance of Witnesses from Without a State in Criminal Proceedings to secure a witness housed in prison in a different state
finding a lack of good faith where the prosecution failed to utilize the Uniform Act to Secure the Attendance of Witnesses from Without a State in Criminal Proceedings to secure a witness housed in prison in a different state

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Cole, Rosen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.