Michigan Court of Appeals· 11/21/1995
Williams v. Williams
Citations
- 542 N.W.2d 892
- 214 Mich. App. 391
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that in-person demeanor assessment may be warranted when two or more witnesses have competing factual claims and there is no externally analyzable indicia of truth
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cavanagh, Markman, Glazer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Sparks v. SparksMichigan Supreme Court· 1992-06-30· cited 264×
- Beason v. BeasonMichigan Supreme Court· 1990-09-11· cited 174×
- Sands v. SandsMichigan Supreme Court· 1993-03-23· cited 63×
- Donaldson v. DonaldsonMichigan Supreme Court· 1903-09-15· cited 34×
- Kiefer v. KieferMichigan Court of Appeals· 1995-07-18· cited 24×
- Urban v. UrbanSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1998-04-01· cited 17×
- St. Clair Commercial & Savings Bank v. MacAuleyMichigan Court of Appeals· 1975-12-10· cited 15×
- Michigan Bank-Midwest v. D J Reynaert, IncMichigan Court of Appeals· 1988-01-19· cited 15×
- Huber v. Frankenmuth Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals· 1987-06-02· cited 14×
- Parlove v. KleinMichigan Court of Appeals· 1972-01-17· cited 13×
- Sands v. SandsMichigan Court of Appeals· 1992-02-03· cited 13×
- Rapaport v. RapaportMichigan Court of Appeals· 1990-08-07· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.