Rapaport v. Rapaport

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]here a party alleges that a fraud has been committed on the court, it is generally an abuse of discretion for the court to decide the motion without first conducting an evidentiary hearing into the allegations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Yee v. Shiawassee County Board of Commissioners
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2002-09-10· cited 191×
• Williams v. Williams
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1995-11-21· cited 33×
• Kiefer v. Kiefer
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1995-07-18· cited 24×
• Nederlander v. Nederlander
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1994-05-03· cited 20×
• Saffian v. Simmons
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2005-09-28· cited 20×
• People of Michigan v. Darius Lamarr Franklin
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2017-05-12

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rapaport v. Rapaport
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1987-03-06· cited 16×
• St. Clair Commercial & Savings Bank v. MacAuley
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1975-12-10· cited 15×
• Michigan Bank-Midwest v. D J Reynaert, Inc
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1988-01-19· cited 15×
• MacArthur v. Miltich
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1981-10-19· cited 9×
• Young v. David Young
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1955-06-06· cited 6×
• State v. Fox
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-12-02· cited 5×