Wyoming Supreme Court· 9/24/1991
Williams v. Williams
Citations
- 817 P.2d 884
- 1991 Wyo. LEXIS 151
- 1991 WL 186852
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- if a violation of law is not continuous in its nature, separate indictments or informations may be maintained for each violation; a distinct repetition of a prohibited act, even on the same day, may constitute a second offense and incur an additional penalty
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Urbigkit, Cardine, MacY, Golden, Rooney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Neuman v. NeumanWyoming Supreme Court· 1992-11-30· cited 30×
- Lund v. LundWyoming Supreme Court· 1993-03-25· cited 21×
- Forney v. MinardWyoming Supreme Court· 1993-03-24· cited 13×
- Mair v. MairWyoming Supreme Court· 1992-01-08· cited 6×
- Muller v. MullerWyoming Supreme Court· 1992-09-28· cited 6×
- Bishop v. BishopWyoming Supreme Court· 1997-08-14· cited 5×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Martinez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 1980-05-22· cited 260×
- Hance v. StraatsmaWyoming Supreme Court· 1986-07-02· cited 28×
- Sellers v. SellersWyoming Supreme Court· 1989-06-22· cited 24×
- Igo v. IgoWyoming Supreme Court· 1988-08-23· cited 9×
- Overcast v. OvercastWyoming Supreme Court· 1989-10-13· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.