Bishop v. Bishop

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the parties must request special findings of fact if they are desired, and in the absence of a special finding, a general finding by the trial court carries with it every finding of fact supported by the record”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Snyder v. Lovercheck
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1999-12-13· cited 95×
• Hogan & Associates Builders, Llc, a Wyoming Limited Liability Company v. Eiden Construction, Llc, a Wyoming Limited Liability Company and Amco Insurance Company, an Iowa Corporation
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 2024-12-20· cited 11×
• Ryan Amadio v. Tara Amadio
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 2025-02-17· cited 9×
• Guy Morrison, Iii v. Tami Hinson-Morrison
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 2024-09-05· cited 8×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Paul v. Paul
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1980-07-29· cited 81×
• Grosskopf v. Grosskopf
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1984-02-10· cited 77×
• Kane v. Kane
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1978-04-12· cited 33×
• Neuman v. Neuman
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1992-11-30· cited 30×
• Kennedy v. Kennedy
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1988-09-23· cited 25×
• Deroche v. R.L. Manning Co.
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1987-05-15· cited 24×
• Lund v. Lund
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1993-03-25· cited 21×
• Williams v. Williams
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1991-09-24· cited 9×
• Mair v. Mair
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1992-01-08· cited 6×
• Graham v. Bishop
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1967-04-25· cited 2×
• California Treasure Box v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1934-11-13· cited 1×