Williams v. Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court described expert testimony that no one would buy practice without a non-compete clause as \telling evidence of the lack of goodwill\
• “[T]he evidence should show recent actual sales of a similarly situated practice, or expert testimony as to the existence of goodwill in a similar practice in the relevant market.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Christians v. Christians
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-05-19· cited 6×
• Held v. Held
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-07· cited 4×
• Anthony Busto v. Natalia Arias
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2025-03-19

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hanson v. Hanson
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1987-10-13· cited 76×
• Thompson v. Thompson
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1991-01-10· cited 45×
• Young v. Young
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-05-08· cited 13×
• Walton v. Walton
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-06-28· cited 7×