Supreme Court of Missouri· 10/13/1987
Hanson v. Hanson
Citations
- 738 S.W.2d 429
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the goodwill of a professional practice is subject to division as marital property in a dissolution of marriage proceeding
- stating a strong preference for using the fair market value approach to find the true value of the goodwill of an enterprise for dissolution purposes
- stating a strong preference for using the fair market value approach to find the true value of the goodwill of an enterprise for dissolution purposes
- discussing permissible forms of evidence of marketable goodwill in professional firm
- court erred by valuing Keogh Plan at date dissolution action was filed; proper date of valuation was date of trial
- not error for trial court to find bank accounts and certificates of deposit held jointly between parents and children as marital property
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robertson, Billings, Blackmar, Donnelly, Rendlen, Higgins, Prewitt, Welliver
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
60 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Eslami v. EslamiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-05-21· cited 73×
- Clark v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1990-01-05· cited 60×
- Rombach v. RombachSupreme Court of Missouri· 1993-12-21· cited 56×
- Marriage of Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri· 1987-09-15· cited 53×
- May v. MayWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2003-12-04· cited 47×
- Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Florida· 1991-01-10· cited 45×
- Cleverly v. CleverlySupreme Court of Vermont· 1989-04-14· cited 42×
- Mocnik v. MocnikSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1992-08-18· cited 40×
- Endres v. EndresSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1995-05-17· cited 33×
- Gilman v. HohmanIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-03-09· cited 31×
- Polytech, Inc. v. Affiliated Fm Insurance CompanyEighth Circuit· 1994-04-11· cited 25×
- Theilen v. TheilenMissouri Court of Appeals· 1992-11-24· cited 25×
- Sorensen v. SorensenCourt of Appeals of Utah· 1989-02-10· cited 23×
- Skrabak v. SkrabakCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1996-03-28· cited 23×
- S.L.J. v. R.J.Missouri Court of Appeals· 1989-06-13· cited 22×
- Rapp v. RappMissouri Court of Appeals· 1990-04-10· cited 21×
- In Re Marriage of ThomasMissouri Court of Appeals· 2000-06-30· cited 21×
- Prahinski v. PrahinskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-12-06· cited 21×
- Sullivan v. SullivanMissouri Court of Appeals· 2005-04-12· cited 21×
- Ford v. FordNevada Supreme Court· 1989-11-27· cited 19×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Dardick v. DardickSupreme Court of Missouri· 1984-05-15· cited 158×
- Holbrook v. HolbrookCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1981-06-04· cited 131×
- In Re the Marriage of HallWashington Supreme Court· 1984-12-13· cited 121×
- Dugan v. DuganSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1983-02-28· cited 114×
- Taylor v. TaylorNebraska Supreme Court· 1986-05-16· cited 101×
- Nail v. NailTexas Supreme Court· 1972-11-08· cited 101×
- In Re the Marriage of FleegeWashington Supreme Court· 1979-01-04· cited 67×
- Powell v. PowellSupreme Court of Kansas· 1982-06-11· cited 65×
- Beasley v. BeasleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-11-20· cited 59×
- In Re the Marriage of MorrisMissouri Court of Appeals· 1979-09-04· cited 54×
- Marriage of Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Missouri· 1987-09-15· cited 53×
- Geesbreght v. GeesbreghtCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1978-07-13· cited 38×
- In Re the Marriage of HullMontana Supreme Court· 1986-01-21· cited 30×
- Scott v. ScottMissouri Court of Appeals· 1982-12-21· cited 27×
- Giedinghagen v. GiedinghagenMissouri Court of Appeals· 1986-06-17· cited 13×
- Montgomery v. GettyMissouri Court of Appeals· 1955-11-03· cited 12×
- In Re the Marriage of FreedmanCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1979-03-29· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.