· 6/6/2013
Williams v. United Parcel Services
Citations
- 129 Nev. 386
- 302 P.3d 1144
- 129 Nev. Adv. Rep. 41
- 2013 WL 2445155
- 2013 Nev. LEXIS 47
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing that when a statute is clear and unambiguous, this court \give [s] effect to the plain and ordinary meaning of the words\
- recognizing that issues of statutory construction are reviewed de novo
- refusing to deviate from the plain meaning of a statute and rejecting arguments that would require the court to read additional language into the statute
- refusing to deviate from the plain meaning of a statute and rejecting arguments that would require the court to read additional language into the statute
- refusing to deviate from the plain meaning of a statute and rejecting arguments that would require the court to read additional language into the statute
- refusing to deviate from the plain meaning of a statute and rejecting arguments that would require reading additional language into a statute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gibbons, Douglas, Saitta
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.