Skip to main content
· 6/6/2013

Williams v. United Parcel Services

Citations

  • 129 Nev. 386
  • 302 P.3d 1144
  • 129 Nev. Adv. Rep. 41
  • 2013 WL 2445155
  • 2013 Nev. LEXIS 47

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that when a statute is clear and unambiguous, this court \give [s] effect to the plain and ordinary meaning of the words\
  • recognizing that issues of statutory construction are reviewed de novo
  • refusing to deviate from the plain meaning of a statute and rejecting arguments that would require the court to read additional language into the statute
  • refusing to deviate from the plain meaning of a statute and rejecting arguments that would require the court to read additional language into the statute
  • refusing to deviate from the plain meaning of a statute and rejecting arguments that would require the court to read additional language into the statute
  • refusing to deviate from the plain meaning of a statute and rejecting arguments that would require reading additional language into a statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gibbons, Douglas, Saitta

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.