Skip to main content
· 3/11/2010

Cromer v. Wilson

Citations

  • 225 P.3d 788
  • 126 Nev. 106
  • 126 Nev. Adv. Rep. 11
  • 2010 Nev. LEXIS 10

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that this court interprets clear and unambiguous statutes based on their plain meaning
  • explaining that this court interprets clear and unambiguous statutes based on their plain meaning
  • “A district court’s order denying summary judgment is an interlocutory decision and is not independently appealable.”
  • interpreting clear and unambiguous statutes based on their plain meaning

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Parraguirre, Douglas, Pickering

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.