· 3/11/2010
Cromer v. Wilson
Citations
- 225 P.3d 788
- 126 Nev. 106
- 126 Nev. Adv. Rep. 11
- 2010 Nev. LEXIS 10
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that this court interprets clear and unambiguous statutes based on their plain meaning
- explaining that this court interprets clear and unambiguous statutes based on their plain meaning
- “A district court’s order denying summary judgment is an interlocutory decision and is not independently appealable.”
- interpreting clear and unambiguous statutes based on their plain meaning
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Parraguirre, Douglas, Pickering
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.