California Court of Appeal· 3/3/1982
Williams v. Taylor
Citations
- 129 Cal. App. 3d 745
- 181 Cal. Rptr. 423
- 1982 Cal. App. LEXIS 1364
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming summary judgment as to a malicious prosecution claim after determination of the probable cause element
- affirming grant of defendants' motion for summary judgment as to malicious prosecution claim because plaintiff presented no evidence raising a triable issue of fact as to whether defendants had sufficient probable cause to seek initiation of criminal charges
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sparks
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Family Home & Finance Center, Inc. v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.Ninth Circuit· 2008-05-07· cited 267×
- Kashian v. HarrimanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2002-05-23· cited 260×
- Hagberg v. California Federal Bank FSBCalifornia Supreme Court· 2004-01-05· cited 223×
- Hassan v. Mercy American River HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court· 2003-08-18· cited 202×
- Lundquist v. ReusserCalifornia Supreme Court· 1994-07-21· cited 140×
- Fridovich v. FridovichSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-04-02· cited 127×
- Slaughter v. FriedmanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1982-08-23· cited 64×
- Cabesuela v. Browning-Ferris Industries of California, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1998-10-27· cited 62×
- Susan E. Johnson v. Educational Testing ServiceFirst Circuit· 1985-01-31· cited 57×
- Lunada Biomedical v. NunezCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2014-10-09· cited 51×
- Cuenca v. Safeway San Francisco Employees Federal Credit UnionCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1986-05-13· cited 49×
- Braun v. Bureau of State AuditsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1998-11-23· cited 48×
- Cummings v. Fire Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1988-07-22· cited 44×
- Beroiz v. WahlCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2000-11-20· cited 36×
- Hunsucker v. Sunnyvale Hilton InnCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1994-03-30· cited 33×
- McNair v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2016-11-22· cited 32×
- Begier v. StromCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1996-06-19· cited 30×
- Fenelon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1990-09-20· cited 29×
- Fremont Compensation Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1996-04-23· cited 27×
- Vivian v. LabrucherieCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2013-03-07· cited 27×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Stationers Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1965-02-09· cited 268×
- Imig v. FerrarCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1977-05-24· cited 67×
- Deaile v. General Telephone Co. of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1974-07-22· cited 54×
- La Verne Ramsden v. W. UnionCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1977-06-29· cited 44×
- King v. BorgesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1972-10-05· cited 42×
- Royer v. SteinbergCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1979-03-15· cited 37×
- Roemer v. Retail Credit Co.California Court of Appeal· 1970-01-09· cited 26×
- Johnson v. Hydraulic Research & Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal· 1977-06-14· cited 17×
- Warfield v. McGraw-Hill, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1973-06-19· cited 13×
- Fairfield v. HaganCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1967-01-27· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.