Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 762 N.E.2d 1216
  • 2002 Ind. LEXIS 143
  • 2002 WL 231223

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that charges for dealing in and possession of cocaine should have been brought at the same time as prior charges for residential entry and possession of cocaine
  • holding that charges for dealing in and possession of cocaine should have been brought at the same time as prior charges for residential entry and possession of cocaine
  • noting that certain charges were barred under Ind. Code § 35-41-4- 4 and accordingly not reaching the defendant’s constitutional double jeopardy claims
  • noting that the “words ‘should have been charged’ [in Indiana Code section 35-41-4-4(a)(3)] must be read in conjunction with Indiana’s joinder statute”
  • concluding sequential prosecution was barred when the defendant was convicted of Residential Entry and Possession of Cocaine and in a separate action with Dealing in Cocaine and Possession of Cocaine, all stemming from a single drug transaction
  • concluding sequential prosecution was barred when the defendant was convicted of Residential Entry and Possession of Cocaine and in a separate action with Dealing in Cocaine and Possession of Cocaine, all stemming from a single drug transaction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Boehm, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.