Skip to main content

Henderson v. State

Citations

  • 647 N.E.2d 7
  • 1995 Ind. App. LEXIS 125
  • 1995 WL 62875

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that this court does not charge defendant twice for those days of delay that overlap
  • describing delay caused by finding special judge qualified to hear case as due to “court congestion”
  • finding a 139-day delay between recusal of the regular judge and the appointment of a special judge an \exigent circumstance\ that tolled the running of the time period under Crim. R. 4
  • decided in the context of denial of a motion to sever charges

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Barteau, Darden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.