Williams v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he trial court erred in denying the appellant’s claim as being barred by collateral estoppel as it is not clear from the record before this Court that the instant claims have ever been decided on the merits.”
• “[T]he trial court erred in denying the appellant’s claim as being barred by collateral estoppel as it is not clear from the record before this Court that the instant claims have ever been decided on the merits”
• “[T]he trial court erred in denying the appellant’s claim as being barred by the doctrine of collateral estoppel as it is not clear from the record before this Court that the instant claim has ever been decided on the merits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Holton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-12-21· cited 3×
• Gonzalez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-10-13· cited 2×
• Garcia v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-09-07· cited 2×
• Moore v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-05-18

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. McBride
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2003-05-15· cited 335×
• Wainwright v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-11-13· cited 8×
• Cofield v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-08-07· cited 5×