District Court of Appeal of Florida· 9/7/2011
Garcia v. State
Citations
- 69 So. 3d 1003
- 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 14154
- 2011 WL 3903109
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[A] defendant is not entitled to successive review of a specific issue that already has been decided on the merits.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ramirez, Salter, Suarez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. McBrideSupreme Court of Florida· 2003-05-15· cited 335×
- Raley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-05-10· cited 61×
- Price v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-25· cited 22×
- Pleasure v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-06-07· cited 16×
- Fuston v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-07-19· cited 12×
- Jenkins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-12-21· cited 11×
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-12-13· cited 9×
- Barnes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-06-16· cited 5×
- Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-01-22· cited 5×
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-03-23· cited 4×
- Tisdol v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-08-14· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.