Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 429 P.3d 301

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that explanations for the peremptory challenge do not need to be persuasive or plausible at step two, just race-neutral
  • recognizing that the explanation for the peremptory challenge only needs to be race-neutral
  • explaining that this court \give[s] great deference to the district court's finding and will only reverse if the district court clearly erred\
  • explaining that this court generally gives \great deference to the district coures finding\ that \no unlawful discrimination occurred\ but cannot do so when \the [district] court fails to properly engage [the three-step Batson] inquiry\
  • explaining the three-step framework as the opponent making a prima facie showing of impermissible discrimination, the proponent offering a neutral, permissible explanation for the strike, and the opponent proving purposeful discrimination
  • explaining the three-step framework for district courts to utilize in resolving Batson objections

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pickering

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.