Nevada Supreme Court· 10/25/2018
Williams v. State
Citations
- 429 P.3d 301
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that explanations for the peremptory challenge do not need to be persuasive or plausible at step two, just race-neutral
- recognizing that the explanation for the peremptory challenge only needs to be race-neutral
- explaining that this court \give[s] great deference to the district court's finding and will only reverse if the district court clearly erred\
- explaining that this court generally gives \great deference to the district coures finding\ that \no unlawful discrimination occurred\ but cannot do so when \the [district] court fails to properly engage [the three-step Batson] inquiry\
- explaining the three-step framework as the opponent making a prima facie showing of impermissible discrimination, the proponent offering a neutral, permissible explanation for the strike, and the opponent proving purposeful discrimination
- explaining the three-step framework for district courts to utilize in resolving Batson objections
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pickering
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Randy Ray Pickering v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court· 2020-05-29· cited 15×
- Cooper v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2018-12-27· cited 14×
- Stewart Roy Yazzie v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court· 2021-06-01· cited 10×
- MATTHEWS (JEMAR) VS. STATENevada Supreme Court· 2020-07-09· cited 2×
- State of Arizona v. Keyaira PorterArizona Supreme Court· 2021-07-22· cited 1×
- BURNS (DAVID) VS. STATENevada Supreme Court· 2021-09-23· cited 1×
- DIXON (STEVEN) VS. STATENevada Supreme Court· 2021-05-06· cited 1×
- COOPER (JAMES) VS. STATENevada Supreme Court· 2018-12-27
- Robinson (Darrius) Vs. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2019-12-12
- Pitts (Lloyd) Vs. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2019-12-13
- Taylor (Terrell) Vs. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2019-12-16
- Smith (Christopher) Vs. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2020-04-15
- Robinson (Javon) Vs. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2020-04-16
- Figueroa (Jose) Vs. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2021-01-15
- Smith (Brenton) Vs. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2021-03-05
- Robertson (Raekwon) Vs. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2021-05-14
- Quintana (Nestor) Vs. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2021-05-14
- Valenti (Steven) Vs. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2021-05-17
- Devose (Christopher) Vs. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2021-09-16
- Arenas (Emilio) Vs. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2021-09-15
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1991-05-28· cited 4,168×
- Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court· 1985-01-21· cited 3,997×
- Purkett v. ElemSupreme Court· 1995-05-15· cited 3,008×
- Miller-El v. DretkeSupreme Court· 2005-06-13· cited 1,931×
- Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1879-01-18· cited 1,827×
- Snyder v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 2008-03-19· cited 1,296×
- Johnson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 2005-06-13· cited 1,022×
- Foster v. ChatmanSupreme Court· 2016-05-23· cited 461×
- State v. HowardSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1981-02-23· cited 119×
- Kaczmarek v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2004-06-07· cited 112×
- United States v. McMathSeventh Circuit· 2009-03-19· cited 96×
- Diomampo v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2008-06-12· cited 68×
- Summitt v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1985-03-26· cited 65×
- Walker v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1997-08-28· cited 50×
- United States v. RutledgeSeventh Circuit· 2011-08-08· cited 46×
- Ford v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2006-04-27· cited 42×
- Brass v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 2012-12-27· cited 40×
- United States v. Eugene ThompsonFifth Circuit· 2013-11-12· cited 38×
- Graves v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1996-02-29· cited 37×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.