Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 2008 OK CR 19
  • 188 P.3d 208
  • 2008 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 18
  • 2008 WL 2553518

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the opinion, without specialized knowledge, would be “pure speculation”
  • holding no error in prosecutor’s argument reasonably based on evidence
  • \(evidence that the defendant committed another crime is admissible to show identity under the common scheme or plan exception when the previous crime prepares the way for another and the second crime is dependent on the commission of the first\
  • \[e]vidence that the defendant committed another crime is admissible to show identity under the common scheme or plan exception when the previous crime prepares the way for another and the second crime is dependent on the commission of the first\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lewis, Lumpkin, Johnson, Chapel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

60 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.