Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1/8/1986
Williams v. State
Citations
- 707 S.W.2d 40
- 1986 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1162
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding statute unconstitutional that required ninety-five percent remittitur of amount of bond if defendant was produced within two years after judgment, thus altering or nullifying final judgment rendered by a court
- holding statute unconstitutional that required ninety-five percent remittitur of amount of bond if defendant was produced within two years after judgment, thus altering or nullifying final judgment rendered by a court
- Allowing Legislature to alter final judgment under pretense of regulating procedures for bail would make “the power of the judicial branch ... a mockery, subject to the whim of the Legislature.”
- “[T]he Legislature has no power to alter a final judgment rendered by the court in a bond forfeiture. Otherwise, the power of the judicial branch would be a mockery, subject to the whim of the Legislature. The finality of judgments would not exist and courts would be Legislative forums.”
- “[T]he Legislature has no power to alter a final judgment rendered by the court in a bond forfeiture. Otherwise, the power of the judicial branch would be a mockery, subject to the whim of the Legislature. The finality of judgments would not exist and courts would be Legislative forums.”
- A [T]he Legislature has no power to alter a final judgment rendered by the court in a bond forfeiture. Otherwise, the power of the judicial branch would be a mockery, subject to the whim of the Legislature. The finality of judgments would not exist and courts would be Legislative forums. @
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Onion, White
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Meshell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-07-01· cited 390×
- Armadillo Bail Bonds v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-01-23· cited 173×
- in the Interest of D.W., T.W., and S.G., ChildrenTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2008-02-19· cited 161×
- Evans Ex Rel. Kutch v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 2002-08-30· cited 108×
- State v. CondranTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1997-07-25· cited 51×
- Norton v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1996-01-18· cited 50×
- In Re DWCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2008-02-19· cited 25×
- Wright v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2006-10-25· cited 24×
- Gramercy Insurance Co. v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1992-05-06· cited 22×
- Wilson-Everett v. Christus St. JosephTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2007-11-29· cited 20×
- Ex Parte BarnesCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1998-01-29· cited 20×
- Ex Parte DotsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-06-05· cited 17×
- Bailout Bonding Co. v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1990-09-05· cited 16×
- H & C Communications, Inc. v. Reed's Food International, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1994-10-05· cited 14×
- Jackson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1993-06-24· cited 7×
- Bonds v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1995-11-09· cited 7×
- State v. SellersCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1989-01-26· cited 6×
- Shaw v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1991-02-27· cited 1×
- Reo Dell Wright v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2006-10-25
- Unnamed caseTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2007-11-29
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.