Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 3/28/1973
Williams v. State
Citations
- 493 S.W.2d 863
- 1973 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2269
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that court- appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw is not self-proving and the appellant must produce evidence in support of the allegations of the motion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Onion
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Whitehead v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2004-03-31· cited 375×
- Malcom v. State of TexasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-03-10· cited 177×
- Hoffman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-10-09· cited 77×
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-06-09· cited 46×
- Ex Parte FloresCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-06-09· cited 46×
- Morgan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-01-16· cited 18×
- Turner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1987-06-10· cited 3×
- Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-04-18· cited 2×
- Morrow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1982-06-30· cited 1×
- Mayo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-12-15· cited 1×
- Reginald Keith Gray v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2004-06-30
- Whitehead, PattiCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2004-03-31
- Dalton Bryce Massie-Weaver v. the State of TexasTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2022-03-31
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.