Mayo v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering effect of prosecutor’s emphasizing a void previous conviction and arguing to the jury that the defendant had a previous conviction and thus had already been given a chance and should not be given another one

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Mitchell Edward Arterberry III v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2025-08-14

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ex Parte Bilton
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-04-16· cited 213×
• Landry v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-07-18· cited 50×
• Ex Parte Flores
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-06-09· cited 46×
• Minix v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-01-24· cited 40×
• Ex Parte Charles
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-04-25· cited 29×
• Ex Parte Banks
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-10-20· cited 27×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-07-02· cited 19×
• Madeley v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-11-29· cited 18×
• Williams v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-03-28· cited 18×
• McComb v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-11-08· cited 15×
• Ex Parte Valdez
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-05-03· cited 10×
• Clark v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-06-27· cited 9×
• Ex Parte Huff
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-07-18· cited 8×