Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 964 S.W.2d 747
  • 1998 Tex. App. LEXIS 1330
  • 1998 WL 93295

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding trial court’s error in refusing offer of proof “was harmless” because context made clear “exactly what [defendant] wanted to preserve for appeal”
  • holding error in refusing offer of proof was harmless because context 18 made clear what evidence defendant intended to preserve
  • indicating refusal to allow offer of proof harmless because record sufficient to preserve complaint for appeal
  • stating trial court’s refusal to allow defendant’s offer of proof regarding excluded testimony was harmless because it was clear from record “exactly what [defendant] wanted to preserve for appeal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, Hudson, O'Neill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.