Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 621 S.W.2d 613
  • 1981 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1168

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that unexplained 7 exclusive possession of stolen jewelry in pockets of clothing defendant was wearing and in trunk of car defendant was driving on afternoon burglary took place was sufficient evidence to sustain conviction
  • Recent unexplained possession of stolen property taken in a burglary is sufficient proof to establish a defendant's guilt of the offense
  • Recent unexplained possession of stolen property taken in a burglary is strong evidence to establish the defendant's guilt of the offense
  • Recent unexplained possession of stolen property taken in a burglary is strong evidence to establish the defendant’s guilt of the offense
  • Recent unexplained possession of stolen property taken in a burglary is sufficient proof to establish a defendant’s guilt of the offense
  • “That the automobile was not a stolen automobile is immaterial since the officers at the time of the appellant’s arrest and search and the search and inventory of the automobile had probable cause to believe the automobile was stolen.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roberts, Dally and Teague

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.