Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 7/15/1987
Williams v. State
Citations
- 528 A.2d 507
- 72 Md. App. 233
- 1987 Md. App. LEXIS 365
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding a condition of probation may be enforced only through the power to revoke the probation, not through contempt proceedings
- holding a condition of probation may be enforced only through the power to revoke the probation, not through contempt proceedings
- “[A] condition of probation may be enforced only through the power to revoke the probation, not through contempt proceedings.”
- “When a probationer violates a condition of his probation, he is not subject to an additional punishment for that violation; but rather to the forfeiture of his conditional exemption from punishment for the original crime.”
- “When a probationer violates, a condition of his probation, he is not subject to an additional punishment for that violation; but rather to the forfeiture of his conditional exemption from punishment for the original crime.”
- superseded by statute on other grounds
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Weant, Bishop, Alpert
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. Michael LetaskyMontana Supreme Court· 2007-02-23· cited 40×
- Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-06-16· cited 29×
- State v. WilliamsNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1989-06-22· cited 17×
- State v. BohannonSupreme Court of Vermont· 2010-03-11· cited 14×
- A.W. v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2005-03-17· cited 11×
- Finn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas· 1991-11-13· cited 6×
- Songer v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1991-09-03· cited 5×
- Robert B. v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-07-08· cited 5×
- Commonwealth v. NicelyKentucky Supreme Court· 2010-11-18· cited 4×
- State of Minnesota v. Miranda Lynn JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2015-08-26· cited 4×
- State v. McCrayNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2019-03-29· cited 4×
- State v. Agdinaoay.Hawaii Supreme Court· 2021-11-30· cited 3×
- Catlin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1990-02-07· cited 3×
- AW v. Com.Kentucky Supreme Court· 2005-06-16
- STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. ANTOINE MCCRAY STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. SAHAILE GABOUREL (17-11-1346, MIDDLESEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE W-2018-3276-0906, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (CONSOLIDATED) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2019-03-29
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Logan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-02-11· cited 117×
- Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1965-04-02· cited 88×
- Coles v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-05-25· cited 75×
- Kaylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-04-26· cited 49×
- Clipper v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1983-02-04· cited 32×
- Turner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-11-07· cited 23×
- Smitley v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-02-06· cited 14×
- Turner v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-04-29· cited 11×
- Mitchell v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1984-03-12· cited 7×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1980-05-12· cited 5×
- Kursch v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1983-06-10· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.