Williams v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that a defendant’s responses to prompting statements constitute the real “evidentiary weight of the conversation”
• declarant's statements largely designed to prompt defendant to speak held not to be hearsay; \it was the statements made by [defendant] that really constituted the evidentiary weight of the conversation\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Matthew Bryant v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2013-03-15· cited 49×
• Lehman v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2010-04-13· cited 45×
• Dora Ann Swain v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1998-12-01· cited 30×
• Thomas Mack v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2014-12-18· cited 26×
• Williams v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2010-07-16· cited 21×
• State v. Siegel
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2002-04-26· cited 13×
• In re Nadeau
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2007-01-30· cited 6×
• Katyun Marsh v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2015-04-08
• Bryant Lamonte White v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2015-11-25
• Jerrick L. Whitley v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2020-08-31
• Krisean Porter v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2020-12-08
• Tyreontay Tyrin Jackson v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2023-10-23
• Anthony M Cook v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2023-10-10
• Deshawn Luckett v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2023-11-29

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Colorado v. Connelly
  Supreme Court· 1986-12-10· cited 4,016×
• Illinois v. Perkins
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 906×
• Huspon v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1989-11-06· cited 12×