Tyreontay Tyrin Jackson v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• articulating the “tension between Navegar and [the D.C. Circuit’s] cases upholding preenforcement review of First Amendment challenges to criminal statutes”
• applying Navegar because it 7 was “the only circuit case dealing with a non-First Amendment preenforcement challenge to a criminal statute that ha[d] not reached the court through agency proceedings”
• requiring a “credible statement . . . 4 For the purposes of this analysis the Court assumes, but need not decide, that pre- enforcement standing is also available for policies and other Executive actions (in addition to statutes
• finding it significant that “plaintiffs allege[d] no prior threats against them”
• “[I]njuries that are shared and generalized—such as the right to have the government act in accordance with the law—are not sufficient to support standing[.]”
• state’s general interest in enforcing its gun laws was insufficient to confer standing on plaintiffs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).