Supreme Court of Florida· 10/28/1982
Williams v. State
Citations
- 421 So. 2d 512
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- refusing to apply a new rule retroactively because it would entail hearings with “evidence possibly long since destroyed, misplaced, or deteriorated” and witnesses who “may not be available or [whose] memory might be dimmed”
- refusing to apply a new rule retroactively because it would entail hearings with “evidence possibly long since destroyed, misplaced, or deteriorated” and witnesses who “may not be available or [whose] memory might be dimmed”
- refusing to apply a rule in part because it “would not enhance the reliability of the fact-finding process [and] . . . has no bearing on guilt and did not involve an attack on the fairness of the trial”
- \It was reasonable... to rely upon [the old] law. That significant reliance has been placed on the old rule is an important factor supporting [exclusively] prospective application of the new rule.\
- \[T]he standards established in Witt are fully applicable to noncapital cases.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McDonald
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- John F. Mosley v. State of Florida & SC14-2108 John F. Mosley v. Julie L. Jones, etc.Supreme Court of Florida· 2016-12-22· cited 151×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2005-04-28· cited 124×
- Mark James Asay v. State of Florida, SC16-102 Mark James Asay v. Julie L. Jones, etc. & SC16-628 Mark James Asay v. Julie L. Jones, etc.Supreme Court of Florida· 2016-12-22· cited 110×
- Commonwealth v. SchaefferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1987-12-29· cited 76×
- Barrios-Cruz v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-06-10· cited 68×
- Geter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-09-27· cited 64×
- Chandler v. CrosbySupreme Court of Florida· 2005-10-06· cited 34×
- State v. WillDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-11-09· cited 17×
- State v. AustinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-09-01· cited 7×
- Hargrave v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1983-01-13· cited 6×
- Morris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-11-09· cited 3×
- Matthew Dettle v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2024-10-24
- Anthony Floyd Wainwright v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2025-06-03
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 8,419×
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 6,066×
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 2,898×
- Barber v. PageSupreme Court· 1968-04-29· cited 1,846×
- Coker v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1977-06-29· cited 1,233×
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court· 1971-05-17· cited 1,155×
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1982-06-21· cited 1,037×
- United States v. CaceresSupreme Court· 1979-04-13· cited 883×
- Witt v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1980-07-24· cited 342×
- State v. SarmientoSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-01-15· cited 82×
- Tollett v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1973-01-10· cited 35×
- Markham v. MarkhamSupreme Court of Florida· 1973-01-31· cited 22×
- Hoberman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-07-31· cited 16×
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-11-29· cited 9×
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-12-08· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.