Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 591 S.W.2d 873
  • 1979 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1763

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that lack of consent may be proved by circumstantial evidence
  • holding that lack of consent may be proved by circumstantial evidence
  • holding that lack of consent may be proved by circumstantial evidence
  • holding lack of consent may be proved by circumstantial evidence
  • reasoning, when the owner did not testify, that it was a “completely unreasonable hypothesis” that the owner had provided consent for the taking of the dress
  • reasoning, when the owner did not testify, that it was a “completely unreasonable hypothesis” that the owner had provided consent for the taking of the dress

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Odom, Davis, Clinton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.