Ashby v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there must be some evidence in the record to support the lack of consent but that the State’s witnesses do not have to articulate the magic words “effective consent” and the lack thereof

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Davis
  California Supreme Court· 1998-11-05· cited 129×
• Zaiontz v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1985-11-06· cited 12×
• Lee v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1998-01-15· cited 9×
• William Paul Hudson v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2015-03-23
• Selery Moore v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2000-08-01
• Hugo Hernandez v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2005-07-07
• Jeremiah Leonard Martinez v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2015-04-30
• Troy Lee Bridges v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2015-02-12
• Bridges, Troy Lee
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2015-11-13

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Burks v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1978-06-14· cited 4,912×
• Greene v. Massey
  Supreme Court· 1978-06-14· cited 1,268×
• Reynolds v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1977-02-23· cited 106×
• Taylor v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-04-24· cited 67×
• Cortez v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-04-11· cited 35×
• Williams v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-12-12· cited 24×
• Stallworth v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1958-11-12· cited 14×
• Mitchell v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1958-05-21· cited 9×
• Thornton v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1962-01-03· cited 9×