Skip to main content

Williams v. State

Citations

  • 143 So. 2d 484

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \[The judge] may ask questions to clarify the issues but he should not lean to the prosecution or defense lest it appear that his neutrality is departing from center.\
  • Trial judge \may ask questions to clarify the issues but he should not lean to the prosection [sic] or defense lest it appear that his neutrality is departing from center.\
  • Trial judge \may ask questions to clarify the issues but he should not lean to the prosection [sic] or defense lest it appear that his neutrality is departing from center.\
  • Trial judge “may ask questions to clarify the issues but he should not lean to the prosection [sic] or defense lest it appear that his neutrality is departing from center.”
  • prosecutorial comments which are not inflammatory or egregious do not necessitate a new trial
  • sole evidence linking defendant to a holdup-murder was that the defendant bought the murder weapon in a pawn transaction some 2 1/2 years prior to the murder, which weapon was also used in a subsequent holdup-shooting about a month after the charged murder; murder conviction reversed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

61 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.