Williams v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• violation of probation must be both willful and substantial and the willful and substantial nature of the violation must be supported by the greater weight of the evidence
• record did not support court’s revocation of probation based on failure to obtain approval before changing address because evidence established that appellant was forced to leave his residence and was living on the street
• state failed to present sufficient evidence to demonstrate defendant’s probation violations for changing residence without consent and failing to report were willful and substantial where defendant was living on the street and his homelessness was not intentional

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• MARIA BRAVO v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-12-12· cited 3×
• Garity v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-12-19· cited 2×
• Charles v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-11-02· cited 2×
• Boyer v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-06-21· cited 2×
• Adams v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-12-20· cited 1×
• Whiting v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-07-10· cited 1×
• Boyd v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-03-24
• C.B. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-06-19

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Demps v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1984-12-20· cited 69×
• Steiner v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-09-09· cited 44×
• Lynom v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-29· cited 20×
• Thomas v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-04-24· cited 10×
• Moore v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-02-16· cited 5×